
Head of Marketing - Earned Media
Digital Marketing | SEO
Backlinks shape rankings, but not every link carries the same...
By Narender Singh
May 27, 2026 | 5 Minutes | |
Backlinks still pull serious weight in SEO. Google has said so. Independent studies from Ahrefs, Backlinko, and Semrush keep confirming it year after year. But here is the catch most marketers learn the hard way: not every backlink passes value. Some links lift rankings. Others just sit there looking pretty.
The deciding factor is whether the backlink is dofollow or nofollow.
So before celebrating that hard-earned mention on a popular blog, it pays to check what kind of link the site actually gave. A quick inspection takes seconds. The impact on link-building strategy lasts months.
Links on the web carry hidden instructions for search engines. Those instructions sit inside the HTML tag.
rel="nofollow".Google introduced two more attributes back in 2019 that work like cousins of nofollow:
rel="sponsored" for paid or affiliate linksrel="ugc" for user-generated content such as forum posts or blog commentsGoogle now treats all three as hints rather than strict rules. Meaning the algorithm may still consider them for ranking signals if it wants to. Interesting shift, but in practice, dofollow links remain the gold standard.
A study by Authority Hacker analyzing over 1 billion pages showed that pages ranking in the top 10 had roughly 3.8 times more dofollow backlinks than pages ranking lower. That is not a small gap.
Here is why the link type should influence outreach decisions:
So the goal is not to chase only dofollow links. The goal is to know what you are getting.
No need for fancy tools. Most checks take under a minute.
Right-click and inspect element
rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored" or rel="ugc", the link does not pass full authorityUse a browser extension
View page source
Use Ahrefs, Semrush, or Moz
Free online checkers
Knowing the typical placement helps set expectations during outreach.
| Link Type | Common Placements |
|---|---|
| Dofollow | Editorial guest posts, niche directories, resource pages, partner sites |
| Nofollow | Wikipedia, Reddit, Quora, most news sites, social media bios |
| Sponsored | Paid reviews, affiliate links, influencer collaborations |
| UGC | Blog comments, forum signatures, community Q&A replies |
Big publishers like Forbes, HuffPost, and The New York Times almost always use nofollow on outbound links. That does not make a mention there worthless. Brand authority and referral clicks alone can justify the effort.
A few practical habits that separate strategic SEOs from the ones spraying outreach emails blindly:
One example from a recent SaaS campaign: a single dofollow placement on a niche industry blog with a domain rating of 52 moved a target keyword from position 14 to position 6 within eight weeks. Meanwhile, three nofollow mentions on bigger publications added traffic but barely nudged rankings. Different links, different jobs.
Ignoring nofollow links entirely is a rookie move. They serve real purposes:
A mention on TechCrunch or Wired with a nofollow tag can still send qualified visitors, build credibility, attract secondary links from smaller blogs that copy the story.
Not anymore. Since March 2020, Google treats nofollow as a hint. The algorithm may consider these links for crawling or ranking purposes when it sees fit.
There is no fixed number. It depends on keyword competition, niche, and existing authority. Quality and relevance beat quantity every time.
Not at all. They are a natural part of any healthy backlink profile. A site with only dofollow links often looks manipulated to search engines.
Yes. Site owners can edit link attributes any time. Reaching out and asking for a dofollow change is a legitimate tactic, though success rates vary.
Sponsored signals paid or affiliate relationships. Nofollow is broader. Both prevent full authority transfer, but sponsored is the correct tag for any commercial arrangement.